-
[交通]
茂名港完成绿色甲醇首船作业,贯彻双碳战略取得标志性成果
-
[交通]
中国最大自航式纯电驱深海海缆敷设船“蓝海领航”下水
-
[氢能]
又一绿氢标杆倒下:中国 与沙特合资的西班牙绿氢项目宣告清算
-
[光伏]
全球首座16兆瓦张力腿浮式风电平台正式投运
-
[氢能]
【零碳深度】告别储能依赖!蓝昆氢能模块化方形电解槽破局“绿电离网制氢”
-
[氢能]
丰田氢能在美国退出市场了吗? 在美国参与的氢能重卡 长什么样?
-
[氢能]
船用燃料电池为什么不能简单把车用系统搬上船?
-
[政策]
重磅!国家能源局启动村镇微能网建设试点:破局县域绿色转型,打通乡村能源“微循环”
-
[氢能]
庆阳公共交通集团氢燃料电池车辆采购项目 -宇通客车中标
-
[交通]
驶向绿色未来:古晋城市交通系统(KUTS)开启马来西亚氢能出行新纪元
To finish 2023, I would like to share with you two very nice works talking about the stack costs in electrolysis technologies. Look for them in the comments but in the graph and as follow you have my take on them.
The differences in cost between the different electrolysis technologies comes from two factors: raw materials and manufacturing of these stacks. Despite the relatively high cost of electrolysis stacks, we will have a decline in those stacks due to different factors depending on the technology:
✔ Alkaline. Improve materials will allow us to have larger stacks. Decrease of the use of Ni as well as improved electrode performance to run the stack at higher current densities will lead us to cheaper stacks.
✔ PEM. As in the alkaline case, the improvement of material performance will lead us to higher current densities. Likewise, the decrease of the catalyst loading of Ir and Pt and the less need of expensive protective coating will allow us to reach lower costs.
✔ SOEC. Together with some material performance that will lead to an increase of the stack size, the larger effect in this technology will come by more cost-effective manufacturing processes. Optimization of both cell and interconnect manufacturing will be key to this cost reduction.
In conclusion, these studies show us that there is hope to obtain very cost-effective electrolysis stacks. However, important investments will be needed to fulfil them. Both Research and Development (R&D) and manufacturing investments will be equally important to get us to the final line of producing green hydrogen cost-competitively.

平台声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,零碳未来网 系信息发布平台,我们仅提供信息存储空间服务。

发表评论 取消回复