-
[交通]
全国最大氢动力船舶“云韬一号”顺利吉水-总长70米、宽14米,续航里程760公里
-
[风电]
超千吨“大风车”在深远海打造巨型“充电宝”-100%国产化!
-
[储能]
订单排到2031年!又一行业,爆单了-燃气轮机行业迎来了新的发展机遇
-
[氢能]
绿色氢能市场预计将从 2025 年的 27.9 亿美元增长至 2032 年的 748.1 亿美元,复合年增长率达到 60.0%
-
[氢能]
潍柴动力 氢内燃机取得零碳动力商业化新突破
-
[交通]
伊藤忠商事与Peninsula Petroleum推出氨燃料加注合资企业
-
[氢能]
康迪泰克亮相FCVC,推出H35和H70高压加氢解决方案
-
[交通]
德国 戴姆勒卡车与KEYOU达成合作 :氢内燃机卡车加速商业化
-
[交通]
英国: 牛津郡推出首辆双燃料氢能公路养护车辆
-
[氢能]
全球最大氢燃料电池发电厂正式开工建设 装机容量达到108MW
Hydrogen buses are a financial black hole for transit agencies.
We've all known for a while that hydrogen buses are more expensive to buy and run than and an electric bus, however, this assumption is actually a vast understatement.
A more appropriate example would be a financial black hole that sucks in every cent a transit agency has.
Why do I say this?
Let's take a look at some simple math, starting with Michael Sura's excellent analysis and graphic below.
Using the following energy consumption assumptions;
BEV bus - 130kWh/100km
FCEV bus - 10.25kg/100km
We can calculate cost per 100km, based on California's current electricity and hydrogen prices of:
Electricity - 20c/kWh
Hydrogen - $36/kg
Leads us to total energy cost per 100 kilometres (62 miles):
BEV bus - $26
FCEV bus - $369
In other words, the FCEV is 14x more expensive to run in California.
Mein Gotts.
It's not just poor thermodynamics and inefficient storage that's the problem, you need to add in the extra cost of the bus, infrastructure and more expensive maintenance.
In fact, these numbers are best case. In California, most depots benefit from heavily subsidized solar for charging, further reducing the cost.
Hydrogen fuel stations also have subsidies, however, based on recent experience of FCEV users, you can't discount the fact that the hydrogen might not rock up at all. In other words, the H2 bus goes nowhere - just like happened to the H2 buses in Scotland.
While we know that California's grid ain't the world's sturdiest, we also know that green hydrogen will have a 3x higher impact on the grid than battery electric.
ie If you think an EV fleet is marginal on the grid, then you absolutely CANNOT do hydrogen - unless you decide to import some polluting grey or black hydrogen from somewhere.
Which, unfortunately, it is this bait and switch game that is the hydrogen reality.
Can you think of a reason why a transit agency would want to run hydrogen FCEV buses?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments below

平台声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,零碳未来网 系信息发布平台,我们仅提供信息存储空间服务。

发表评论 取消回复