-
[氢能]
巴拉德公司宣布 收购零排放氢能解决方案提供商GeoPura-8250万英镑的现金以及向GeoPura股东发行约5080万股巴拉德普通股(股价5.02美元)
-
[风电]
国家电网在巴西投资建设史上最大输电项目,计划2029年投运 巴西东北部新能源送出 ±800 千伏特高压直流输电项目全线开工建设
-
[氢能]
酷暑天,奥地利 氢能公交起火!该公司全部停运
-
[交通]
从直驱到增程:上汽放弃大功率直驱,全面转向小功率氢电增程技术
-
[交通]
雷诺氢电混动概念车Embleme 综合续航里程可达 1000 公里
-
[光伏]
荷兰将太阳能电池板集成到温室玻璃中 一种半透明光伏玻璃,它能选择性地捕捉对发电最有用的特定波长的光
-
[氢能]
法国开发商FDE在钻探现场发现氢气浓度达到50%,将于2028-2029年开始天然氢气生产
-
[光伏]
2026年,日本钙钛矿太阳能电池终于从“实验室技术”迈向“商业化起点”。
-
[氢能]
比亚迪进军氢能!弗迪燃料电池产品配套广汽领程登上工信部408批公示
-
[储能]
本田HONDA拉上美国初创公司一起开发汽车固态电池 预计到2040年续航可达到约 1250 公里。
Hydrogen buses are a financial black hole for transit agencies.
We've all known for a while that hydrogen buses are more expensive to buy and run than and an electric bus, however, this assumption is actually a vast understatement.
A more appropriate example would be a financial black hole that sucks in every cent a transit agency has.
Why do I say this?
Let's take a look at some simple math, starting with Michael Sura's excellent analysis and graphic below.
Using the following energy consumption assumptions;
BEV bus - 130kWh/100km
FCEV bus - 10.25kg/100km
We can calculate cost per 100km, based on California's current electricity and hydrogen prices of:
Electricity - 20c/kWh
Hydrogen - $36/kg
Leads us to total energy cost per 100 kilometres (62 miles):
BEV bus - $26
FCEV bus - $369
In other words, the FCEV is 14x more expensive to run in California.
Mein Gotts.
It's not just poor thermodynamics and inefficient storage that's the problem, you need to add in the extra cost of the bus, infrastructure and more expensive maintenance.
In fact, these numbers are best case. In California, most depots benefit from heavily subsidized solar for charging, further reducing the cost.
Hydrogen fuel stations also have subsidies, however, based on recent experience of FCEV users, you can't discount the fact that the hydrogen might not rock up at all. In other words, the H2 bus goes nowhere - just like happened to the H2 buses in Scotland.
While we know that California's grid ain't the world's sturdiest, we also know that green hydrogen will have a 3x higher impact on the grid than battery electric.
ie If you think an EV fleet is marginal on the grid, then you absolutely CANNOT do hydrogen - unless you decide to import some polluting grey or black hydrogen from somewhere.
Which, unfortunately, it is this bait and switch game that is the hydrogen reality.
Can you think of a reason why a transit agency would want to run hydrogen FCEV buses?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments below

平台声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,零碳未来网 系信息发布平台,我们仅提供信息存储空间服务。

发表评论 取消回复